OpenPuff is a propietary tool for hiding information. At the moment of writing these lines the las version available is v4.0.1

The analysis this tool was performed using Aletheia.

With a simple experiment we can see that the method used for embedding is LSB replacement. That is, the tool hides the bits of the message by replacing the least significant bit (LSB) of the pixel.

The tool asks for three different passwords, the carrier image (we use a PNG file) and the bitrate or payload used (we choose the minimum: 12%). For the experiment we use the Lena image.

After saving the output image, we can check the modified pixels:

$./aletheia.py print-diffs lena.png stego.png Channel 1: [(226, 227, 1), (228, 229, 1), (223, 222, -1), (226, 227, 1)] [(229, 228, -1), (231, 230, -1), (235, 234, -1), (203, 202, -1)] [(170, 171, 1), (174, 175, 1), (175, 174, -1), (178, 179, 1)] [(182, 183, 1), (194, 195, 1), (203, 202, -1), (197, 196, -1)] ... Channel 2: [(134, 135, 1), (127, 126, -1), (129, 128, -1), (130, 131, 1)] [(150, 151, 1), (143, 142, -1), (145, 144, -1), (142, 143, 1)] [(86, 87, 1), (65, 64, -1), (75, 74, -1), (78, 79, 1)] [(92, 93, 1), (100, 101, 1), (103, 102, -1), (103, 102, -1)] ... Channel 3: [(133, 132, -1), (116, 117, 1), (119, 118, -1), (121, 120, -1)] [(121, 120, -1), (98, 99, 1), (82, 83, 1), (90, 91, 1)] [(87, 86, -1), (86, 87, 1), (92, 93, 1), (93, 92, -1)] [(95, 94, -1), (93, 92, -1), (98, 99, 1), (93, 92, -1)] ...  As you can see in the results, when a pixel of the cover image is even the performed operation is +1 and when a pixel of the cover image is odd the performed operation is -1. This is what happens when the embedding operation is LSB replacement. This anomaly has been exploited by several attacks [1, 2, 3]. Let’s try the SPA attack: $ ./aletheia.py spa stego.png
Hiden data found in channel R 0.15
Hiden data found in channel G 0.15
Hiden data found in channel B 0.14


Obviously, with the original Lena image, the tool does not detect any hidden data:

\$ ./aletheia.py spa lena.png
No hiden data found


References

[1]. Attacks on Steganographic Systems. A. Westfeld and A. Pfitzmann. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.1768, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000, pp. 61−75.

[2]. Reliable Detection of LSB Steganography in Color and Grayscale Images. Jessica Fridrich, Miroslav Goljan and Rui Du. Proc. of the ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security, Ottawa, Canada, October 5, 2001, pp. 27-30.

[3]. Detection of LSB steganography via sample pair analysis. S. Dumitrescu, X. Wu and Z. Wang. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51 (7), 1995-2007.